All Counties in California, Eviction Risk 2026
58 counties covering 1,594 incorporated cities and 37,374,942 residents. Statewide average landlord risk score is 6.2/10 (Elevated), but county-level scores vary sharply, urban counties with strong tenant protections or high rent burdens routinely score several points above rural counties.
| County↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | Lean↕ | Renters↕ | % income on rent↕ | Avg rent↕ | Poverty↕ | Cities↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | San Francisco County | 830,235 | 9.9 | Dem | 61.8% | 25.1% | $2,476 | 10.6% | 1 |
| 02 | Los Angeles County | 9.74M | 7.4 | Dem | 40.1% | 33.7% | $2,172 | 10.4% | 144 |
| 03 | Alameda County | 1.65M | 7.2 | Dem | 40.2% | 29.6% | $2,633 | 7.6% | 21 |
| 04 | Santa Clara County | 1.79M | 6.9 | Dem | 32.3% | 28.5% | $2,990 | 5.9% | 22 |
| 05 | Kings County | 141,446 | 6.8 | Rep | 55.1% | 29.6% | $1,279 | 20.8% | 20 |
| 06 | Imperial County | 164,040 | 6.6 | Dem | 45.1% | 33.3% | $1,044 | 26.2% | 19 |
| 07 | Orange County | 3.17M | 6.6 | Dem | 34.9% | 35.9% | $2,483 | 8.3% | 51 |
| 08 | Ventura County | 801,166 | 6.6 | Dem | 30.2% | 35.0% | $2,383 | 8.0% | 25 |
| 09 | San Bernardino County | 2.07M | 6.5 | Dem | 36.2% | 35.5% | $1,579 | 15.4% | 53 |
| 10 | Santa Barbara County | 428,748 | 6.5 | Dem | 40.7% | 32.9% | $2,183 | 13.1% | 28 |
| 11 | Merced County | 244,698 | 6.5 | Dem | 43.4% | 30.9% | $1,206 | 16.6% | 24 |
| 12 | Monterey County | 360,373 | 6.5 | Dem | 43.0% | 34.7% | $2,035 | 14.0% | 25 |
| 13 | Marin County | 239,409 | 6.5 | Dem | 28.2% | 33.6% | $2,774 | 9.9% | 30 |
| 14 | San Diego County | 3.07M | 6.5 | Dem | 32.3% | 34.0% | $2,311 | 9.1% | 56 |
| 15 | Fresno County | 905,932 | 6.5 | Dem | 42.7% | 32.7% | $1,227 | 23.4% | 45 |
| 16 | Humboldt County | 111,307 | 6.4 | Dem | 42.9% | 35.2% | $1,354 | 26.1% | 39 |
| 17 | Stanislaus County | 501,577 | 6.4 | IND | 36.5% | 34.0% | $1,602 | 15.8% | 31 |
| 18 | Solano County | 439,396 | 6.4 | Dem | 36.0% | 33.0% | $1,999 | 8.9% | 11 |
| 19 | Contra Costa County | 1.23M | 6.3 | Dem | 28.6% | 34.1% | $2,553 | 7.9% | 50 |
| 20 | San Mateo County | 725,367 | 6.3 | Dem | 30.2% | 27.4% | $2,931 | 5.3% | 33 |
| 21 | Sacramento County | 1.58M | 6.3 | Dem | 34.4% | 33.5% | $1,811 | 13.3% | 35 |
| 22 | Mendocino County | 44,047 | 6.3 | Dem | 43.9% | 36.9% | $1,377 | 17.5% | 23 |
| 23 | Kern County | 883,293 | 6.3 | Rep | 40.2% | 35.9% | $1,321 | 22.2% | 80 |
| 24 | Riverside County | 2.37M | 6.3 | Dem | 27.7% | 33.0% | $1,713 | 13.8% | 66 |
| 25 | Tulare County | 409,774 | 6.2 | Rep | 47.9% | 31.5% | $1,111 | 27.9% | 60 |
| 26 | Sonoma County | 394,819 | 6.2 | Dem | 32.8% | 31.3% | $2,113 | 8.4% | 35 |
| 27 | San Joaquin County | 724,017 | 6.1 | Dem | 35.7% | 32.6% | $1,892 | 13.5% | 28 |
| 28 | Santa Cruz County | 224,718 | 6.1 | Dem | 34.0% | 31.0% | $2,242 | 8.4% | 33 |
| 29 | Napa County | 124,412 | 6.1 | Dem | 33.4% | 35.8% | $2,107 | 9.3% | 14 |
| 30 | Yolo County | 209,974 | 6.1 | Dem | 41.3% | 35.6% | $1,754 | 23.4% | 16 |
| 31 | Lake County | 52,974 | 6.1 | Dem | 26.0% | 34.8% | $1,519 | 15.1% | 15 |
| 32 | Siskiyou County | 25,514 | 6.0 | Rep | 36.4% | 36.0% | $977 | 18.6% | 23 |
| 33 | Yuba County | 77,295 | 5.9 | Rep | 34.5% | 35.3% | $1,687 | 20.8% | 18 |
| 34 | Madera County | 131,995 | 5.9 | Rep | 24.6% | 34.5% | $1,577 | 17.2% | 16 |
| 35 | San Luis Obispo County | 243,175 | 5.9 | Dem | 35.2% | 35.9% | $1,912 | 12.0% | 31 |
| 36 | Nevada County | 46,040 | 5.8 | Dem | 46.3% | 36.3% | $1,586 | 20.1% | 15 |
| 37 | El Dorado County | 133,945 | 5.7 | Rep | 27.3% | 32.1% | $1,758 | 9.0% | 13 |
| 38 | San Benito County | 50,310 | 5.7 | Dem | 23.2% | 33.7% | $2,135 | 7.5% | 5 |
| 39 | Inyo County | 12,942 | 5.7 | IND | 46.1% | 26.3% | $1,287 | 17.2% | 16 |
| 40 | Lassen County | 19,769 | 5.7 | Rep | 40.2% | 33.3% | $994 | 24.6% | 12 |
| 41 | Tehama County | 32,669 | 5.6 | Rep | 36.5% | 36.8% | $1,140 | 24.2% | 16 |
| 42 | Placer County | 357,854 | 5.6 | Rep | 23.4% | 34.5% | $1,802 | 8.2% | 21 |
| 43 | Colusa County | 17,689 | 5.6 | Rep | 35.0% | 28.1% | $1,210 | 14.8% | 8 |
| 44 | Trinity County | 12,862 | 5.5 | Rep | 34.0% | 26.7% | $1,034 | 21.4% | 14 |
| 45 | Alpine County | 1,948 | 5.5 | Dem | 41.1% | 33.2% | $1,845 | 14.2% | 7 |
| 46 | Shasta County | 144,793 | 5.5 | Rep | 27.7% | 31.7% | $1,322 | 20.9% | 27 |
| 47 | Sutter County | 90,615 | 5.4 | Rep | 27.2% | 32.8% | $1,636 | 14.0% | 10 |
| 48 | Tuolumne County | 33,061 | 5.3 | Rep | 23.6% | 38.2% | $1,545 | 10.3% | 19 |
| 49 | Butte County | 175,752 | 5.3 | IND | 26.3% | 39.4% | $1,471 | 16.2% | 24 |
| 50 | Mariposa County | 7,998 | 5.3 | Rep | 44.1% | 34.5% | $1,562 | 20.8% | 16 |
| 51 | Calaveras County | 28,074 | 5.2 | Rep | 19.2% | 36.3% | $1,504 | 16.9% | 19 |
| 52 | Del Norte County | 12,156 | 5.1 | Rep | 24.8% | 40.3% | $1,234 | 18.6% | 10 |
| 53 | Amador County | 36,759 | 5.1 | Rep | 22.5% | 31.3% | $1,572 | 11.8% | 25 |
| 54 | Glenn County | 17,358 | 5.1 | Rep | 33.2% | 30.9% | $1,088 | 17.3% | 7 |
| 55 | Modoc County | 5,126 | 4.8 | Rep | 32.8% | 28.1% | $819 | 30.6% | 13 |
| 56 | Plumas County | 13,140 | 4.8 | Rep | 27.2% | 41.4% | $1,242 | 13.5% | 34 |
| 57 | Mono County | 21,443 | 4.8 | Dem | 28.9% | 30.0% | $1,419 | 13.6% | 17 |
| 58 | Sierra County | 7,566 | 4.8 | Rep | 29.7% | 33.6% | $1,694 | 13.9% | 25 |
Understanding county eviction risk in California
California's 58 counties span eviction-risk scores from 4.8 in Sierra County to 9.9 in San Francisco County , a 5.1-point gap that captures how unevenly rent burdens, renter populations, and local tenant politics are distributed across the state. The statewide average sits at 6.2/10 (Elevated), but that single figure hides far more than it reveals, the table above scores every county on the same 1–10 scale so you can see exactly where landlord exposure concentrates.
The counties carrying the most eviction risk, San Francisco County, Los Angeles County, Alameda County, are California's denser, higher-cost markets. In Plumas County, renters spend an average of 41% of household income on rent, and 27% of its homes are renter-occupied, the cost pressure that pushes filings up and pulls tenant-protection ordinances into local politics. Larger metros also concentrate the legal-aid networks and renter-organizing capacity that lift a county's score above the rural baseline.
At the other end of the table, Sierra County, Mono County, Plumas County score lowest. These tend to be smaller, more rural counties where homeownership is the norm, rent-to-income ratios run lower, and local rent-control or just-cause ordinances are rare or state-preempted. Evictions still happen there, but the structural pressure that drives a high score (heavy rent burden, a large renter majority, organized tenant advocacy) is simply weaker.
Each county score is a population-weighted aggregate of every city scored inside it, so a county with one expensive urban core and a dozen quiet suburbs lands somewhere in between. Click any county row to drill into its cities ranked one by one, a zoomed heat map, and a full breakdown of rent burden, renter share, poverty rate, and political margin. For the statutes that apply statewide regardless of county, notice periods, security-deposit caps, just-cause and rent-control rules, see the California state overview.