All Counties in California, Eviction Risk 2026
58 counties covering 1,594 incorporated cities and 37,374,942 residents. Statewide average landlord risk score is 7.8/10 (High), but county-level scores vary sharply, urban counties with strong tenant protections or high rent burdens routinely score several points above rural counties.
| County↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | Lean↕ | Renters↕ | % income on rent↕ | Avg rent↕ | Poverty↕ | Cities↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | San Francisco County | 830,235 | 9.7 | Dem | 61.8% | 25.1% | $2,476 | 10.6% | 1 |
| 02 | Imperial County | 164,040 | 8.3 | Dem | 45.1% | 33.3% | $1,044 | 26.2% | 19 |
| 03 | Alameda County | 1.65M | 8.2 | Dem | 40.2% | 29.6% | $2,633 | 7.6% | 21 |
| 04 | Merced County | 244,698 | 8.2 | Dem | 43.4% | 30.9% | $1,206 | 16.6% | 24 |
| 05 | Los Angeles County | 9.74M | 8.2 | Dem | 40.1% | 33.7% | $2,172 | 10.4% | 144 |
| 06 | Fresno County | 905,932 | 8.2 | Dem | 42.7% | 32.7% | $1,227 | 23.4% | 45 |
| 07 | Contra Costa County | 1.23M | 8.1 | Dem | 28.6% | 34.1% | $2,553 | 7.9% | 50 |
| 08 | San Joaquin County | 724,017 | 8.1 | Dem | 35.7% | 32.6% | $1,892 | 13.5% | 28 |
| 09 | Humboldt County | 111,307 | 8.1 | Dem | 42.9% | 35.2% | $1,354 | 26.1% | 39 |
| 10 | Monterey County | 360,373 | 8.1 | Dem | 43.0% | 34.7% | $2,035 | 14.0% | 25 |
| 11 | Mendocino County | 44,047 | 8.1 | Dem | 43.9% | 36.9% | $1,377 | 17.5% | 23 |
| 12 | Marin County | 239,409 | 8.1 | Dem | 28.2% | 33.6% | $2,774 | 9.9% | 30 |
| 13 | San Benito County | 50,310 | 8.1 | Dem | 23.2% | 33.7% | $2,135 | 7.5% | 5 |
| 14 | Santa Clara County | 1.79M | 8.0 | Dem | 32.3% | 28.5% | $2,990 | 5.9% | 22 |
| 15 | Lake County | 52,974 | 8.0 | Dem | 26.0% | 34.8% | $1,519 | 15.1% | 15 |
| 16 | Sacramento County | 1.58M | 8.0 | Dem | 34.4% | 33.5% | $1,811 | 13.3% | 35 |
| 17 | Santa Barbara County | 428,748 | 8.0 | Dem | 40.7% | 32.9% | $2,183 | 13.1% | 28 |
| 18 | San Bernardino County | 2.07M | 8.0 | Dem | 36.2% | 35.5% | $1,579 | 15.4% | 53 |
| 19 | Santa Cruz County | 224,718 | 8.0 | Dem | 34.0% | 31.0% | $2,242 | 8.4% | 33 |
| 20 | Solano County | 439,396 | 8.0 | Dem | 36.0% | 33.0% | $1,999 | 8.9% | 11 |
| 21 | Napa County | 124,412 | 8.0 | Dem | 33.4% | 35.8% | $2,107 | 9.3% | 14 |
| 22 | San Mateo County | 725,367 | 7.9 | Dem | 30.2% | 27.4% | $2,931 | 5.3% | 33 |
| 23 | Tulare County | 409,774 | 7.9 | Rep | 47.9% | 31.5% | $1,111 | 27.9% | 60 |
| 24 | Riverside County | 2.37M | 7.9 | Dem | 27.7% | 33.0% | $1,713 | 13.8% | 66 |
| 25 | Stanislaus County | 501,577 | 7.9 | IND | 36.5% | 34.0% | $1,602 | 15.8% | 31 |
| 26 | Ventura County | 801,166 | 7.9 | Dem | 30.2% | 35.0% | $2,383 | 8.0% | 25 |
| 27 | Sonoma County | 394,819 | 7.9 | Dem | 32.8% | 31.3% | $2,113 | 8.4% | 35 |
| 28 | Yolo County | 209,974 | 7.9 | Dem | 41.3% | 35.6% | $1,754 | 23.4% | 16 |
| 29 | San Diego County | 3.07M | 7.9 | Dem | 32.3% | 34.0% | $2,311 | 9.1% | 56 |
| 30 | Madera County | 131,995 | 7.9 | Rep | 24.6% | 34.5% | $1,577 | 17.2% | 16 |
| 31 | Kern County | 883,293 | 7.8 | Rep | 40.2% | 35.9% | $1,321 | 22.2% | 80 |
| 32 | Sutter County | 90,615 | 7.8 | Rep | 27.2% | 32.8% | $1,636 | 14.0% | 10 |
| 33 | Kings County | 141,446 | 7.8 | Rep | 55.1% | 29.6% | $1,279 | 20.8% | 20 |
| 34 | Orange County | 3.17M | 7.7 | Dem | 34.9% | 35.9% | $2,483 | 8.3% | 51 |
| 35 | Butte County | 175,752 | 7.6 | IND | 26.3% | 39.4% | $1,471 | 16.2% | 24 |
| 36 | Alpine County | 1,948 | 7.6 | Dem | 41.1% | 33.2% | $1,845 | 14.2% | 7 |
| 37 | Nevada County | 46,040 | 7.6 | Dem | 46.3% | 36.3% | $1,586 | 20.1% | 15 |
| 38 | Mono County | 21,443 | 7.5 | Dem | 28.9% | 30.0% | $1,419 | 13.6% | 17 |
| 39 | Colusa County | 17,689 | 7.5 | Rep | 35.0% | 28.1% | $1,210 | 14.8% | 8 |
| 40 | San Luis Obispo County | 243,175 | 7.5 | Dem | 35.2% | 35.9% | $1,912 | 12.0% | 31 |
| 41 | Siskiyou County | 25,514 | 7.4 | Rep | 36.4% | 36.0% | $977 | 18.6% | 23 |
| 42 | Inyo County | 12,942 | 7.4 | IND | 46.1% | 26.3% | $1,287 | 17.2% | 16 |
| 43 | El Dorado County | 133,945 | 7.4 | Rep | 27.3% | 32.1% | $1,758 | 9.0% | 13 |
| 44 | Glenn County | 17,358 | 7.4 | Rep | 33.2% | 30.9% | $1,088 | 17.3% | 7 |
| 45 | Yuba County | 77,295 | 7.4 | Rep | 34.5% | 35.3% | $1,687 | 20.8% | 18 |
| 46 | Placer County | 357,854 | 7.4 | Rep | 23.4% | 34.5% | $1,802 | 8.2% | 21 |
| 47 | Trinity County | 12,862 | 7.4 | Rep | 34.0% | 26.7% | $1,034 | 21.4% | 14 |
| 48 | Shasta County | 144,793 | 7.3 | Rep | 27.7% | 31.7% | $1,322 | 20.9% | 27 |
| 49 | Tuolumne County | 33,061 | 7.3 | Rep | 23.6% | 38.2% | $1,545 | 10.3% | 19 |
| 50 | Calaveras County | 28,074 | 7.2 | Rep | 19.2% | 36.3% | $1,504 | 16.9% | 19 |
| 51 | Mariposa County | 7,998 | 7.2 | Rep | 44.1% | 34.5% | $1,562 | 20.8% | 16 |
| 52 | Del Norte County | 12,156 | 7.2 | Rep | 24.8% | 40.3% | $1,234 | 18.6% | 10 |
| 53 | Tehama County | 32,669 | 7.1 | Rep | 36.5% | 36.8% | $1,140 | 24.2% | 16 |
| 54 | Amador County | 36,759 | 7.1 | Rep | 22.5% | 31.3% | $1,572 | 11.8% | 25 |
| 55 | Plumas County | 13,140 | 7.1 | Rep | 27.2% | 41.4% | $1,242 | 13.5% | 34 |
| 56 | Lassen County | 19,769 | 7.0 | Rep | 40.2% | 33.3% | $994 | 24.6% | 12 |
| 57 | Sierra County | 7,566 | 7.0 | Rep | 29.7% | 33.6% | $1,694 | 13.9% | 25 |
| 58 | Modoc County | 5,126 | 6.8 | Rep | 32.8% | 28.1% | $819 | 30.6% | 13 |
Understanding county eviction risk in California
California's 58 counties span eviction-risk scores from 6.8 in Modoc County to 9.7 in San Francisco County , a 2.9-point gap that captures how unevenly rent burdens, renter populations, and local tenant politics are distributed across the state. The statewide average sits at 7.8/10 (High), but that single figure hides far more than it reveals, the table above scores every county on the same 1–10 scale so you can see exactly where landlord exposure concentrates.
The counties carrying the most eviction risk, San Francisco County, Imperial County, Alameda County, are California's denser, higher-cost markets. In Plumas County, renters spend an average of 41% of household income on rent, and 27% of its homes are renter-occupied, the cost pressure that pushes filings up and pulls tenant-protection ordinances into local politics. Larger metros also concentrate the legal-aid networks and renter-organizing capacity that lift a county's score above the rural baseline.
At the other end of the table, Modoc County, Sierra County, Lassen County score lowest. These tend to be smaller, more rural counties where homeownership is the norm, rent-to-income ratios run lower, and local rent-control or just-cause ordinances are rare or state-preempted. Evictions still happen there, but the structural pressure that drives a high score (heavy rent burden, a large renter majority, organized tenant advocacy) is simply weaker.
Each county score is a population-weighted aggregate of every city scored inside it, so a county with one expensive urban core and a dozen quiet suburbs lands somewhere in between. Click any county row to drill into its cities ranked one by one, a zoomed heat map, and a full breakdown of rent burden, renter share, poverty rate, and political margin. For the statutes that apply statewide regardless of county, notice periods, security-deposit caps, just-cause and rent-control rules, see the California state overview.