Skip to content
Neighborhood · Toms River, NJ

Twin Oaks Eviction Risk: Lower

1 census tracts · pop 6,807 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3.2/10 · range 3.2–3.2

Twin Oaks is a one-tract neighborhood of Toms River, NJ and houses 6,807 people. It carries an Eviction Risk Score of 3.2/10, in the Lower tier. 50% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate.

Against a Toms River baseline of 29.1%, 50% of renters here cross the 30%-of-income line. Pulling the other way is economic stress, at 1.4/10. Court records for this tract carry 63 eviction filings.

SNAP participation is 5.9% of households versus 15.2% nationally. Filing activity peaked in 2015 at 7.4% of renter households. The most recent observed rate, 3.9% in 2018, is well off that peak.

Among the 17 mapped neighborhoods of Toms River, it ranks #14 by risk, the lower third. At 6% renter-occupied, this is predominantly owner territory, and rental comps have to be drawn from further out.

The closest comparables inside the same city are Georgetown and Eastwind. Poverty sits at 6%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

One tract means one number: 3.2/10 applies directly to any address inside the boundary. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
1 tracts · population-weighted
Twin Oaks vs Toms River How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
50.4% +73%
Toms River: 29.1%
Average gross rent
$0 -100%
Toms River: $1,731
Average HH income
$137,841 +44%
Toms River: $95,759
Poverty rate
5.6% -11%
Toms River: 6.3%
Renter share
5.9% -67%
Toms River: 18.2%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Twin Oaks and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 3.2–3.2

Why Twin Oaks scores 3.2

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 6.8–6.8 across tracts
6.8
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 3.6–3.6 across tracts
3.6
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 4.2–4.2 across tracts
4.2
Rent control risk
50% of income on rent · Range 6.9–6.9 across tracts
6.9
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 6.9–6.9 across tracts
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
6% renter households · Range 4.4–4.4 across tracts
4.4
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 5.3–5.3 across tracts
5.3
Economic stress
5.6% below poverty line · Range 1.4–1.4 across tracts
1.4
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 5.0–5.0 across tracts
5.0
Risk score comparison

Twin Oaks vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Twin Oaks score vs. parent city, state, U.S.Twin Oaks: 3.23.2Twin OaksNeighborhoodParent city: 4.64.6Parent cityhost cityState: 6.46.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.15.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Twin Oaks

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
34029723200 3.2 6,807 50%
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 15

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 37%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 71%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 35%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 0%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history in Twin Oaks

Aggregated across 1 validated constituent tract. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 63Total filings (sum)
  • 4.80%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.4%Peak year (2015)
  • 3.90%Latest filed (2018)
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Twin Oaks

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Twin Oaks

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Twin Oaks?

Twin Oaks scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Twin Oaks compare to Toms River overall?

Twin Oaks scores 1.4 points lower than Toms River overall (4.6/10). Renters spend 50% of income on rent vs 29% citywide.
Q3

What percentage of Twin Oaks residents are renters?

6% of Twin Oaks households are renter-occupied (vs 18% in Toms River). The neighborhood has 6,807 residents.
Q4

Is Twin Oaks a high social-vulnerability area?

Twin Oaks sits in the 15th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (low vulnerability). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q5

How safe is Twin Oaks for landlords?

Twin Oaks carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3.2/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Toms River as a whole (4.6/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q6

What is the demographic breakdown of Twin Oaks?

Twin Oaks has 6,873 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (72%), Hispanic / Latino (17.9%), Other / Multiracial (6.7%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Twin Oaks

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Toms River

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Twin Oaks.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further