Bayshore Eviction Risk: High

At $1,116 a month, rents sit 55% under what the rest of San Francisco commands. What pushes the score up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint is eviction-process difficulty at 10/10. Running hot is tenant-organizing strength at 10/10. 24% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate.

Food insecurity affects 29.2% of adults, 11.4 points above the national rate. The poverty rate is 17%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than the filing statistics suggest. SNAP participation is 25.4% of households versus 15.2% nationally.

Among the 53 mapped neighborhoods of San Francisco, it ranks #1 by risk, the upper third. For a like-for-like read, Little Saigon and Hayes Valley score within a fraction of it.

Social vulnerability runs high at 8.2/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input. The 2 tracts here are tightly clustered, 0 points apart at the extremes. Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $60,044.

60% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

With little internal variation, 9.9/10 is a fair proxy for any address inside the boundary. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.